HOME

Frameworks for democratic integrity in a reunited Ireland

 Democracy worldwide is under renewed strain from resurgent authoritarian forces and intensified internal political polarization, making the task of protecting democratic institutions urgent in any context of constitutional change. In a reunited Ireland, safeguarding democratic principles will require more than procedural guarantees; it demands a living architecture of protections that preserves individual freedoms, sustains vigilant civic participation, and strengthens institutions against capture. Key vulnerabilities include the concentration of executive power, weakening of independent judiciaries, erosion of press freedom, disinformation-driven civic disengagement, and political incentives that reward zero-sum identity politics rather than pluralistic compromise.

Democracy's fundamental freedom:  In an era when democracy is the preferred political system for enlightened societies worldwide, why are so many well-established democracies being challenged by internal actors who promote populist solutions to complex issues? Additionally, why are so many citizens supporting such an authoritarian tilt? The focus of this article is on how to prevent such anti-democratic posturing from taking hold in a reunited Ireland.  

Without resorting to clichés to praise the virtues of democracy, it’s enough to say that democracy is the only political system most of us have known — a way of life and living that we often take for granted. It enables us to elect our government, criticize and peacefully protest government policies, and live our lives without fear of government retribution. It also grants us the freedom to move openly both within our own country and across other democratic nations. Our democratic rights are ours by natural law, as long as we extend the same rights to others.

It is hard to imagine living under a political system ruled by an authoritarian leader, where every action and word would be subject to strict rules. That scenario is not as unlikely as some might think. It is happening right now in several democracies across Europe, South America, the Middle East, and even in the United States, the birthplace of the first modern democracy.

Global rise of authoritarianism: Authoritarian leaders in Poland and Hungary have taken their first steps away from democracy by bringing independent judicial systems under their control. Israel is now following suit. The MAGA movement in America is determined to overturn democracy after two hundred and fifty years of fighting for liberty, which is the core of American democracy. People have elected authoritarian leaders in Argentina and Venezuela who pledged to destroy democracy in favor of political convenience. The extent to which these anti-democratic movements will succeed remains uncertain.

The path to authoritarianism is clearly marked and frequently followed. The most common strategy used by authoritarian leaders is to exploit public unrest or grievances, such as inadequate or affordable housing, homelessness, poor healthcare, migration, or other pressing social issues. They and their allies blame democracy for government inaction or indifference toward the struggles of ordinary, hardworking taxpayers. They claim that democracy fosters poor government policies, vested interests, legislative indecision, and bureaucratic and judicial interference in government affairs. Their proposed solution is for strong-minded leaders to seize control of the government and ‘get things done.’ This approach may seem simple, but it is clever enough to deceive an unsuspecting majority until it’s too late.

Ireland’s specific vulnerabilities: Ireland is not immune to would-be authoritarian leaders exploiting the frustration of ordinary citizens, just like any of the at-risk democracies mentioned above. Such an attempt was made in the early 1930s. Eoin O’Duffy, the garda (police) commissioner, tried and failed to carry out a coup to prevent the first Fianna Fáil government from taking power after winning the 1932 general election decisively.

Aside from the rise of authoritarianism, another weakness for Ireland is religious dogmatism. Ireland has a tendency, or at least a history, of being submissive concerning the role of the church in their lives. Their acceptance of the church as the authority on truth in all matters has been a crutch for the vast majority of people, especially during the last century. The role of the church in the secular domain was indistinguishable from that of the government. Government policies were shaped within parameters aligning with Christian principles. Nearly all social programs and institutions were controlled and managed by the church at the government's request, a regrettable neglect of government responsibility. A return to that way of life is akin to reverting to a darker age, a prospect that must also be guarded against in a reunited Ireland.

Federal system safeguards: The proposed federal system for a reunified Ireland would be a liberal democracy, meaning a form of representative democracy where civil liberties and economic freedoms are protected by limiting government power. This protection would be enshrined in a written constitution that defines the government's powers and the separation and distribution of those powers. The constitution would also include a social contract to ensure that the state serves the will of the people, who collectively are the source of all political power entrusted to the state. 

Although a reunited Ireland would be a federal parliamentary republic established by a written constitution that all citizens must obey and pledge allegiance to, that alone would not be sufficient to prevent an authoritarian-minded leader from bypassing democracy. Such an individual would understand how to manipulate the political system and the rules of evidence to obstruct and delay any legal action taken against them — until it’s too late.

Role of the People and Representatives: Since the people are the ultimate guardians of democracy and the source of all political power entrusted to the state, it is our duty to stay engaged in the political process beyond casting votes. Voting grants us the power to select our representatives; therefore, we must hold them accountable for advancing the policies they campaigned on. Representatives who break their promises to their constituents or violate their oath to defend democracy and, by extension, the Constitution, are unfit for office and should not be reelected. We must remain vigilant to ensure that the government reflects the collective will of the people, not that of special interests or benefactors.

Since most authoritarian leaders emerge from within political parties in government, elected representatives are the first line of defense against any move toward authoritarianism by a party leader or usurper. Because of their involvement in policy debates and election campaigns, elected officials have an inside edge on their colleagues' plans. They are therefore better positioned to take swift action to prevent any subversive activities from taking hold. Party operatives, whether inside or outside the government, who support such activities are complicit and must be handled according to the law. Politicians and public servants who remain passive are unfit for public service and should be dealt with accordingly.

Media and legal framework: News outlets, including newspapers, radio, and television, must operate free from censorship and undue influence by owners or government officials to accurately inform the public about government actions. They must do so without distorting the facts or displaying bias. Social media companies should be discouraged from spreading conspiracy theories or using their platforms to coordinate plans for violence or riots. Laws should be specifically designed to ban social media messages that endorse violence against any group based on gender, race, origin, religion, or sexual orientation. Additionally, anti-democratic propaganda on social media must be illegal and subject to penalties.   

Law enforcement and public prosecution agencies must stay alert to changes in the political landscape, clearly distinguishing between vigorous political debate and speech that incites hatred and violence. There is significant flexibility in political discussions within legislative chambers and campaigns, which is essential for democracy. Therefore, any perceived violation should be thoroughly evaluated to see if it threatens democratic principles. When a violation is confirmed, it must be addressed firmly. Political interference should not be tolerated in any subsequent legal proceedings.   

When an individual is brought before a court of law for subversive actions or behavior aimed at undermining democracy, it implies that the threat is real and poses a clear and present danger to democracy and the rule of law. Therefore, the judicial system must be capable of dispensing justice to those who engage in such activities. On the other hand, courts must ensure that the charges being adjudicated are valid and that the rights of the individual charged are not violated in a rush to judgment.

Addressing inequality: The greater good is not always the primary goal of government policy in Ireland and other places. It should be, because that is what voters expect when they choose their representatives. Unfortunately, many political parties and their elected officials often focus on pleasing special interest groups and benefactors, sometimes at the expense of the greater good. As a result, the lack of policies aimed at the greater good increases public discontent and creates opportunities for demagogues and aspiring dictators to promote authoritarian solutions to the many issues the government neglects.

A significant issue is the lack of economic equity and disparities in wealth and income. Promoting a balance between economic equity and wealth would help resolve many other societal problems. This goal is fundamental to the envisioned reunited Ireland under the proposed federal system.

Ultimately, the people, more than any other political or legal safeguard of democracy, can prevent its collapse if they stay actively involved in the political process. A disengaged population invites those who would undermine democracy and seek to become dictators.